On the positive side, this was a well-researched and easily readable, thorough walkthrough of Hammett's life and work. He had a really interesting life and it was enjoyable and sometimes moving to read about it. I hadn't known that he was hounded by McCarthy and his fuckstick anti-communist dicks in the 50s nor how resistant he was to their bullshit. I also didn't realize the full extent of his fame while he was still alive. I knew he partied pretty hard but didn't realize how much of it was as part of the Hollywood elite. Damn, they drank!
Unfortunately, this biography is also once again a hagiography and it really harms the material. Nolan is just too keen to reinforce and remind us how Hammett was both a superior writer and a superior person, even though at times for the latter his actual behaviour actively contradicts such a characterization. He did do a lot of good and did seem to have a very strong will and idealism that is impressive and respectable. But he also was a terrible drunk who did a lot of damage to himself and at times to the people around him.
There is a nerdy trope in the crime fiction world that bugged me the first time I encountered it and still bugs me today, though I sort of agree with it more than I did initially: the Hammett is a real hard-boiled writer while Chandler is a flowery romantic. Nolan just has to throw that one in this book and it's just nerdy and lame. He also does a drive-by against the guy who is considered the first hard-boiled detective writer (now totally forgotten), simply it seems to ensure that though this guy's stories were there first, Hammett's are the real ones. It's annoying as hell.
No comments:
Post a Comment