That's not actually fair to Badlands, which isn't boring. It's actually kind of fun and weird, with an absorbing, vibrant portrayal of the Alberta Badlands and the river that runs through it. Unfortunately, because this is "literature", we have to get an elaborate structure, forced themes and stylized language. The main story is about Dawes, an obsessive explorer who has left his wife at home to hunt for dinosaur bones in the Alberta Badlands. He is in competition with two other well-known bone collectors. With him, on an enormous raft with their supplies and a made tent (when things are stable), are Web the steersman, Grizzly the cook and McBride (who bales and is later replaced by Tune, the boy rescued from playing piano in a "hoo-er" house). All of them are strange individuals, communication is limited and seems mainly to release the various tensions among the men. They get into various scrapes and interactions, many of which are entertaining (like when the raft goes through the rapids) or interesting (the various ferries and the photographer). None of these interactions ever go truly crazy (I think this is what marks it as Canadian), though all are marked with eccentric behaviours and the language weighted with excess language and symbolism.
That narrative is further framed by I guess journal entries by Anna Dawes, the explorer's daughter, 56 years later. She gives interprets what he wrote in his journal and laments his absence from their lives. She ends up meeting Anna Yellowbird, the I guess Blackfoot woman, who follows and eventually joins Dawes' expedition (and of course has sex with Dawes and maybe with Web*) after her husband never returned home from WWI. The two Annas attempt to drunkenly trace the raft's route backwards and I guess discover things about themselves.
Once I got into it, Badlands was a mostly fun read. I enjoyed the portrayal of the zany raft crew and the detailed exposition of their work and interactions. Likewise, the description of the environment made me seriously consider taking a trip there. There is a dinosaur museum and I imagine great hiking.
Unfortunately, the goodness of those things were somewhat buried under the forced "literature" elements like a well-made cake under too much cheap icing. There are enough themes embedded here to fill 2-3 undergrad lit seminar sessions and yet none of them end up saying all that much. Something about masculinity, yes a lot about masculinity of course, maybe something about Canada as a nation, buried dinosaur bones as metaphor of something or other, etc. The language is stilted and weirdly stylized. He uses a device where he says the subjects name in two sentences in a row, which I guess is supposed to be deep but just made it confusing as to whose point of view it was when he didn't use the name.
You can see I wasn't exaggerating! |
I'm glad I read it and Kroetsch had an esteemed career and seemed like a decent guy, so happy to have read it but now I am very much ready to get back into some straight-ahead story and ass-kicking.
*This edition was published by PaperJacks which seems kind of cool, though you can see where creative Canada was in 1975 by the books listed there, with references to Tonto, use of the word "Eskimo" and at least one book whose main point seems to be sex between a First Nations woman and a white man.
1 comment:
When I was in my first year of college in Nanaimo at Malaspina we had to do this book in English lit. My teacher was a fat white pompous CanLit ass and he brought Kroetsch in to discuss his writing. Kroetsch was the same sort of ass but only a bigger one because he was empowered by his Canadian literary status. Nevertheless, like you said, some the descriptions around rural Alberta are cool.
Post a Comment