I'm not sure how well this book was received when it came out, but I see why they wanted to make a movie of it. It's hard, probably impossible, to read this book without thinking of the movie. Certainly, Jack Carter in the book is 100% Michael Caine in my mind. I think this is both a testament to the character himself, who almost seems to have been written with Caine in mind and to Caine's performance, which while very Caine-esque still captures the nuance of the Carter character: both a step above his adversaries because he is just such a ruthless badass but also having the advantage of being hometown boy and London-trained. So unlike some other books, having the character's image in mind already because of the movie was not a bad thing. The movie, though, did trigger some distracting comparisons when it came to the plot.
The first half is pretty much the same, with Jack coming back to his hometown of Newcastle (though I don't think the town is ever actually named) to find out why his brother, normally a very careful and temperate man, would have gotten blindingly and obviously drunk and driven off a cliff. It's a great set-up, because Carter, while not in a management position is clearly extremely good at his gangster job and important to his London bosses, who he suspects may be involved as they discourage his trip home. He is a professional and plays it very carefully arriving in town, while also knowing the town very well. There are many classic crime themes at play here: the criminal returning to his roots and seeing how pathetic it all was, the slick urban mob versus the regional gangsters and of course the lone wolf badass who is a total bastard but you can't help rooting for him. It all takes place in a rich portrayal of the commingling of English class dynamics and the grittiness of 70s British Crime. Oh man, the depiction of the pornography is just so pathetic and deeply disturbing.
I really loved the first 3/4 of the book, but found it ended somewhat anti-climactically. It felt a bit forced (not unlike Parker's originally intended ending in The Hunter, before Westlake's editor made one of the greatest edits of all time) and not in line with the tone of the rest of the book. I actually think the movie ending makes more sense. Still a fantastic book.


